Franz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth
Que-1 What is the role of violence in colonialism with reference to The Wretched of the Earth?
The Role of Violence in Colonialism in The Wretched of the Earth
-
Violence as the Basis of Colonial RuleFrantz Fanon argues that colonialism does not rest on dialogue or consent but on brute force. From the outset, the colonizer asserts dominance through military occupation, coercive laws, and economic exploitation. Violence is the foundation upon which colonial authority is erected, and it becomes the permanent condition of colonial societies. In Fanon’s analysis, without the continuous use of force, intimidation, and repression, the colonial system could not survive.
-
Psychological Dimensions of Colonial ViolenceColonial domination extends beyond physical subjugation; it penetrates the mind of the colonized. As a psychiatrist, Fanon highlights how colonialism produces feelings of inferiority, dependency, and fear among the oppressed. This psychological violence disorients communities, fractures their identities, and weakens their capacity for resistance. The colonized, forced into an image of inferiority, come to see themselves through the colonizer’s lens, which makes liberation as much a psychological struggle as a political one.
-
Violence as a Tool of DecolonizationSince colonialism itself is sustained by violence, Fanon contends that it can only be undone through counter-violence. Liberation cannot be achieved by negotiation alone, because the colonial regime refuses to give up its power peacefully. Revolutionary violence becomes a necessary weapon for reclaiming land, resources, and human dignity. By engaging in armed struggle, the colonized people break the imposed hierarchy, reversing the power dynamic that reduced them to subjugated subjects.
-
Violence as a Process of RenewalFanon emphasizes that revolutionary violence has a psychological as well as political function. For the oppressed, it works as a purgative force, cleansing the feelings of inferiority and restoring dignity. The act of revolt provides a collective sense of unity and empowerment, which helps rebuild fractured social bonds. In this way, violence becomes a transformative experience, allowing the colonized to recover their self-respect and redefine themselves as active agents of history.
-
Ambiguities and Risks of ViolenceAlthough Fanon defends the necessity of violence, he does not ignore its dangers. Violence can easily spiral into chaos, creating cycles of revenge or reproducing authoritarian structures once colonialism ends. Post-independence, there is always a danger that new elites might use violence to entrench their own rule, replacing one form of oppression with another. Thus, for Fanon, revolutionary violence must be consciously directed toward genuine social change and not allowed to degenerate into blind destruction.
-
Violence in the Larger Decolonial ProjectFor Fanon, violence is part of a larger struggle that includes cultural, social, and economic renewal. Armed resistance challenges colonial institutions, but true liberation also requires dismantling colonial ideologies and rebuilding society on the principles of justice and equality. Violence, therefore, is not an end in itself but a stage in the broader decolonization process through which the colonized reclaim control over their land, culture, and identity.
Que-2 What does Fanon mean when he says “the infrastructure is also a superstructure” in colonialism?
Fanon’s Statement: “The Infrastructure is Also a Superstructure”
In The Wretched of the Earth, Frantz Fanon makes the provocative claim that, under colonialism, “the infrastructure is also a superstructure.” By this, he means that the economic base and the ideological/cultural superstructure, which Marxism usually treats as distinct, are inseparably fused in the colonial context. Colonialism is not simply an exploitative economic order with a separate ideological justification; rather, the economy itself is racialized and ideological, and ideology is materially embedded in everyday structures of exploitation.
-
Economic Exploitation Bound to RaceFanon stresses that colonial wealth and privilege are inseparable from racial identity. His observation—“you are rich because you are white, you are white because you are rich”—captures how colonial economies tie material wealth to skin color. Economic hierarchy and racial hierarchy are one and the same, making it impossible to separate economic “infrastructure” from ideological “superstructure.” The very structure of the colonial economy is already racialized ideology in action.
-
Economic Systems Carry Ideological FunctionsUnlike in classical Marxism, where the economic base is seen as determining but separate from ideology, Fanon insists that in colonial societies the economy itself embodies ideology. Land ownership, labor divisions, taxation, and resource distribution are organized to uphold colonial domination. These economic arrangements simultaneously produce material inequality and perpetuate ideological claims of superiority and inferiority. Thus, the infrastructure itself functions as a superstructure, legitimizing and reproducing colonial authority.
-
Colonialism as a Total SystemColonial rule is not a compartmentalized structure where economics, politics, and culture can be studied in isolation. It is a totalizing project that permeates every aspect of existence. Exploitation of labor is inseparable from cultural dehumanization, and racial ideology is inseparable from material dispossession. This totalizing character means that the Marxist distinction between base and superstructure collapses in colonial societies.
-
Consequences for DecolonizationFanon’s insight has important implications for liberation struggles. Since colonialism is simultaneously economic and ideological, decolonization cannot be limited to economic reforms like land redistribution or industrial development. It must also dismantle the racial and cultural hierarchies that are embedded in those very economic structures. True liberation, for Fanon, requires a holistic restructuring of society—transforming both the material and the symbolic order.
References:
- Fairchild, Halford H. “Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth in Contemporary Perspective.” Journal of Black Studies, vol. 25, no. 2, 1994, pp. 191–99. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2784461. Accessed 27 Sept. 2025.
- Sandro Luce. From Fanon to the Postcolonials: For a Strategic and Political Use of Identities, vol. 9, https://doi.org/10.3998/pc.12322227.0009.010. Accessed 27 September 2025.
Comments
Post a Comment